If you listen to venture capitalists and tech gurus, cloud computing is “the new dot-com," the “biggest shift in computing in two decades” or even the “Cambrian explosion” of the technology era.
Among its other heavenly attributes, the cloud is being touted for its ability to address the enormous need for energy efficiency of IT’s own footprint.
This makes sense in that, for most financial, software and service sector companies, data centers are a major – and growing source – of greenhouse gas emissions. In 2006, the DOE estimates that U.S. data centers used 61 billion kWh of electricity, representing 1.5 percent of all U.S. electricity use, or the amount used by about 6 million US houses.
Indeed, according to McKinsey & Co’s 2008 analysis, between 2000 and 2006, the amount of energy used to store and handle data doubled, and without efforts to curb demand, current projections show worldwide carbon emissions from data centers will quadruple by 2020.
We will not argue that running previously desktop applications on remote and consolidated server farms leads to numerous sustainability benefits.
At the start of the Industrial Revolution, the focus was similar: economies of scale, security, reliability and cost reduction. Few considered what the transition would do to spur innovations that otherwise would never have occurred. It was only in hindsight that we recognized how “revolutionary” that transition was. However, as the SMART2020 report points out, focusing only on the above benefits to IT’s environmental footprint misses the bigger opportunities for low carbon breakthroughs in other sectors.
So we would like to expand the conversation to think bigger and more imaginatively: A transition to cloud computing enables a level of informed decision-making that was never possible in the past.
Cloud computing could be the tool that unlocks one of the main drivers of unsustainable practices: poorly informed decision-making.
If designers, architects, engineers, general contractors, energy auditors, land use planners and policy makers are able to access services that use vast sets of dynamic, complex and otherwise un-integrated data on the cloud for pennies a minute, think of the massive impact this could have on buildings, infrastructure, land use and urban design and policy-making.
The table below outlines a couple emergent business needs related to sustainability, the sustainability design technique that would help address those needs, and the cloud-enabled functionality that promotes those techniques.
To see the true sustainable design benefits of cloud computing, we’d advocate for a more expansive definition of the cloud than has been the case thus far. The technologies below are typically associated with the cloud, but speculative computing and predictive computing are potentially even more powerful tools in the cloud-based designer’s toolbox. These allow the user to ask “what if” or “which one” about considerations that will directly determine the life-time environmental footprint of their design.
Offering a cloud-based service has three major benefits:
Together, the cloud-enabled features of such a product can allow designers to make smarter decisions based upon higher quality and richer data. It can also accelerate the workflow process, meaning that these smarter designs come to market faster.
So, to sum it all up, the potential environmental benefits of smarter design enabled by a transition to cloud-computing far outweigh the efficiencies associated with consolidating servers. In other words, the sky’s the limit.
Emma Stewart is the Senior Program Lead at Autodesk’s Sustainability Initiative. John F. Kennedy is the firm's Senior Manager of AEC Sustainable Analysis Products.