Nuclear Power and Big Tech Collaborate to Meet Data Center Energy Demands

Posted

Insights From:

    • Corey Hinderstein, Vice President for Studies, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, moderated a cross-sector discussion on the intersection of nuclear energy and digital infrastructure.
    • Greg Cullen, VP Energy Services & Development, Energy Northwest, shared insights on the flexibility and safety benefits of SMRs to meet long-term energy demands.
    • Scott Key Ideas Hunnewell, VP of New Nuclear, TVA, discussed the challenges and opportunities of co-locating nuclear energy assets with data centers, referencing TVA’s Clinch River SMR project.
    • Richard Voorberg, President of North America, Siemens Energy, emphasized the need for global supply chain stability and open collaboration to meet growing power demands.
    • Aaron Johnson, SVP Nuclear, AECON, provided real-world examples from AECON’s SMR build at Ontario Power Generation’s Darlington site, where a fleet approach has reduced costs and timelines.
    • Luke Saladyga, Senior Principal Data Engineer, Oracle, offered a data center perspective on how evolving AI workloads are driving unpredictable power needs and the importance of bridging the cultural and operational gap between tech and utilities.

As the global digital economy surges, hyperscale data centers and AI-driven workloads are placing unprecedented strain on electricity grids. The 2025 Reuters Events SMR & Advanced Reactor conference opened with a pivotal panel bringing together leaders from the nuclear energy, infrastructure, and technology sectors. The discussion focused on how advanced nuclear solutions—most notably Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)—could play a critical role in stabilizing and meeting the rapidly escalating energy demands of the digital era.

The panel, titled “Nuclear Power and Big Tech: Meeting the Surging Demand from Hyperscalers and Data Centers”, brought together key voices from Siemens Energy, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Energy Northwest, AECON, Oracle, and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace to explore an unprecedented collaboration between the traditionally conservative nuclear sector and the fast-moving tech industry.

The Data Center Energy Challenge

Data center loads have surged dramatically with the growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and hyperscale computing. “The AI boom has changed our grid profile,” said Saladyga. “What used to be a consistent, predictable base load is now subject to large, unpredictable spikes. Turbines and reactors weren’t built to adapt at that speed.” He added that the co-location of data centers and nuclear reactors introduces unique regulatory and technical complexities that require collaboration across sectors.

The Case for SMRs

TVA, which holds an early site permit for SMRs at its Clinch River location, sees modular reactors as critical to meet future load demands sustainably. Cullen emphasized the flexibility of SMRs for incremental capacity addition:

“We can scale, improve, and reduce costs faster with SMRs while embedding safety by design.”

Johnson outlined lessons from AECON’s work with Ontario Power Generation at the Darlington site, where fleet deployment strategies from Canada’s reactor refurbishment programs have cut costs by up to 30% from initial to subsequent units. “Continuous improvement through replication and team scaling works,” Johnson said. “We cannot afford to repeat the past of one-off plant designs.”

Collaboration Between Sectors

Voorberg acknowledged the vast challenge of aligning the fast-paced expectations of hyperscale tech with the long timelines of nuclear development.

“Our industry cannot spin up factories overnight. We’re spending $500 million to expand transformer production in Charlotte, but it takes years to bring that online. Honest discussions and real commitments are critical to success.”

Cullen and Hunnewell emphasized the need for deep communication between tech firms and utilities. “We are designing assets for 80 to 100 years, while data centers want power in six months,” Hunnewell noted. “We must bridge that gap by building infrastructure between the generator and the customer that can stabilize these load swings.”

The Road Ahead

The panelists agreed that SMRs offer a compelling option for stable, dispatchable low-carbon power but warned against returning to the past practice of building every plant as a prototype. “Standardization is key,” said Cullen. “We must maximize the benefits of next-gen designs and avoid fragmentation.”

Voorberg concluded with a reminder of the shared urgency:

“This is not about picking winners and losers. We need all forms of generation. SMRs can offer stable baseload power to complement renewables and support the digital economy’s relentless growth.”

Environment + Energy Leader