Most people agree that a healthy environment is a necessary foundation for human health. And yet, our society faces an interesting paradox in health care: as hospitals deliver care to individuals, their environmental footprints – pollution, energy use, waste production, unsustainable food services – can be harmful to our health.
Greening health care, the benefits
The health care sector can have a significant impact in improving the environment in a number of crucial areas, but a key question remains: can environmental stewardship strategies in health care coexist with today’s constant pressure to cut costs? In short, the answer is yes – and it can help reduce health care costs for everyone.
There is a preponderance of evidence that a greener health care enterprise is not only affordable but often results in an improved cost structure. With little or no investment, significant operating savings can be realized. A recent study published by the Commonwealth Fund found that if the health care industry conserved energy, reduced waste and more efficiently purchased operating supplies, it could save more than $15 billion over 10 years.
While these numbers are impressive, the importance of sustainability in health care cannot be boiled down to just the bottom line. We have to remember that greening the health care industry does not just save money, it also saves lives and makes care more affordable for everyone.
Take for example the Fable Hospital, a 300-bed, 600,000 square-foot regional medical center built at a cost of $350 million in 2011. Fable was designed and constructed to meet the US Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) gold-certification level for green building design, construction, operations and maintenance. To do so, it included the best innovations for which there was strong evidence in the scientific literature that they would improve patient and employee safety and health care quality while also reducing operating costs, even if initial construction costs are higher.
Fable Hospital’s features include:
The economic and environmental value totaled more than $10 million a year, which resulted in a payback period of just three years. Among the significant cost benefits were savings from a 20 percent reduction in hospital-associated infections, a 10 percent reduction in patient length of stay, a 50 percent reduction nursing turnover due to increased safety and job satisfaction, an 18 percent reduction in energy demand, and a 30 percent reduction in water demand, totaling almost 10 million gallons.
As this example shows, when weighing issues of environmental impact in health care, we have to look at the triple bottom line of social impact, environmental impact and economic performance. While the three are frequently intertwined, in our industry, we are frequently guilty of focusing so intensely on cutting costs that we overlook these two other critical areas and the impact they can have on those exact areas we are focusing on.
Taking action – how we can make a difference
What will it take to turn the hospital leaders into environmental champions motivated by environmental and human health benefits in addition to bottom-line calculations?
As environmental stewardship officer, Kathy Gerwig is responsible for organizing and managing a nationwide environmental initiative for the organization. Under her leadership, Kaiser Permanente has become widely recognized as an environmental leader in the health care sector. Kathy has testified twice to Congress on the need for federal chemical policy reform, and she has appeared at numerous hearings on environmental issues. Kathy is also Kaiser Permanente’s national leader for Employee Safety, Health and Wellness. She oversees the national departments of workplace safety, workforce wellness, integrated disability management, employee assistance programs and environmental, health and safety. Kathy is author of the recently published Greening Health Care: How Hospitals Can Health the Planet. To learn more, visit share.kp.org/greeninghc