Companies deciding where to spend their advertising budget might reconsider advertising in the newest green-themed issue of major consumer magazines.
New research from Mediamark Research & Intelligence suggests that when it comes to how consumers read magazines, issues dedicated to the environment might put off readers, reports MediaPost.
Magazines that took a general tack on environmental topics fared the worst, according to the research, which came from an issue-specific readership study.
The data may show that readers have been over-saturated by negative information about the environment, MediaPost reports.
From 2006-2008, MRI tracked readership of magazines such as Wired, The Economist, Popular Science, Car and Driver, Automobile, Metropolitan Home, Newsweek, Time, Vanity Fair, Bridal Guide, Modern Bride, Elle, BusinessWeek, Consumer Reports, Forbes and Scientific American.
According to MediaPost, here are some of the results:
While negative as a whole, the above figures suggest a gradual, year-to-year improvement in readership of green-themed magazines.
The research shows that magazines that cover green issues "in connection with a core service message" may fare better.
For instance, issues with themes of "green" weddings, including Bridal Guide and Modern Guide, saw a boost in readership of 24 percent and 38 percent, respectively.
Along the same lines, with a special issue called "Renovation Goes Green and Gorgeous," the audience grew 15 percent for Metropolitan Home.
The readership data stands in contrast to MRI's own research about American's collective perception on the environment. In a 2007 survey (PDF), "Green is Mainstream," MRI found that 63.5 percent of Americans agreed preserving the environment is "very important," while 22 percent rated it as of "average importance." Just 12 percent said it was "not important."
Other research shows that the amount of advertising making "green" claims is on the rise.
Another set of data shows that 42 percent of Americans think global warming is "exaggerated."