EPA Approves North Dakota CCR Permit Program

Posted

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has approved North Dakota’s coal combustion residuals (CCR) permit program, allowing the state to oversee permitting and regulation of CCR disposal in surface impoundments and landfills. The decision transfers authority from the federal government to the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality (NDDEQ), marking the state’s entry as the fourth in the nation with an approved CCR program.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the approval in Bismarck alongside Governor Kelly Armstrong, emphasizing a renewed focus on state-led resource management. 

Zeldin stated:

“By entrusting state experts with the authority to oversee their own resources, we are reinforcing our commitment to both cooperative federalism and permitting reform. North Dakota’s deep understanding of its landscape and community needs ensures that local expertise leads the way in protecting the environment and fostering economic growth.”

While Governor Armstrong shared:

“North Dakota has regulated coal combustion residuals effectively for more than 40 years, protecting both the environment and public health. We appreciate EPA’s recognition of the strength and responsibility of our state-led approach.”

Economic and Resource Development Implications

Supporters of the decision say it will streamline permitting, provide regulatory certainty for power producers, and reinforce local control over energy development. State officials also underscored the potential to recover rare earth elements and critical minerals from CCR—a process seen as strategically important to U.S. energy independence and national security.

North Dakota’s coal industry plays a key role in regional baseload electricity generation, producing some of the nation’s lowest-cost power. Senators John Hoeven and Kevin Cramer both noted that the state-led program provides “a more stable footing for coal producers” by ensuring efficient, cost-effective disposal and recycling of CCR materials.

Environment+Energy Leader Awards - Open for Entries
Turn your sustainability and energy achievements into measurable recognition.
Submit your entry for the 2026 Environment+Energy Leader Awards by December 31, 2025.
Apply Now →

Partial Program Approval

EPA classified North Dakota’s CCR program as a partial approval, since the state did not seek authority for three federal provisions that remain under EPA jurisdiction:

  1. The “Legacy CCR Surface Impoundments” rule finalized in May 2024 (and technical corrections in November 2024).
  2. Alternate liner demonstrations under 40 CFR 257.71(d).
  3. Alternative groundwater protection standards for cobalt, lead, lithium, and molybdenum under 40 CFR 257.95(h)(2), which remains under judicial remand and agency reconsideration.

For these items, federal requirements will continue to apply until North Dakota updates its program and resubmits for full approval.

Public Process and Federal Review

EPA deemed North Dakota’s application complete on May 16, 2025, then opened a 60-day public comment period and held a hybrid public hearing on July 8 at NDDEQ’s Bismarck office. The agency reopened the comment period in August to include additional revisions proposed by NDDEQ before finalizing approval.

“This approval reflects that practical, state-driven solutions can deliver both environmental results and American energy opportunity,” said Cyrus Western, EPA Regional Administrator.

National Context

North Dakota joins Georgia, Oklahoma, and Texas as states with approved CCR permit programs. The shift to state-level management aligns with a broader EPA framework that allows qualified states to operate coal ash programs tailored to regional conditions while maintaining federal safety and groundwater standards.

CCR, commonly known as coal ash, is generated from coal-fired power plants and includes materials such as fly ash, bottom ash, and flue gas desulfurization sludge. Properly managed, these materials can be repurposed in construction and infrastructure applications—though mismanagement has been linked to water contamination risks.

Environment + Energy Leader