Minnesota and New York Earn “A” Grade for Renewable Energy Programs

by | Oct 30, 2018

This article is included in these additional categories:

 

Minnesota and New York have earned an “A” for their renewable energy programs. That’s according to a national scorecard released recently by the Interstate Renewable Energy Council (IREC), which graded nearly 20 state shared renewable energy programs (aka community solar). IREC’s National Shared Renewables Scorecard uses specific criteria to evaluate how each program stacks up against national best practices.

“More states are adopting shared renewable energy programs so more consumers can benefit from clean, renewable energy – including lower income households, multi-family dwellers and underserved communities,” says IREC President/CEO Larry Sherwood. “And they are realizing the economic and environmental benefits of these programs.”

The scorecard grades the 17 active shared renewables programs in 13 states plus Washington, D.C. (IL, NJ and OR are in the process of implementing new programs and are not yet graded.) Details of all state programs are in IREC’s Shared Renewables Policy Catalog. In addition to mandatory statewide programs, utilities in more than half of US states are voluntarily creating shared solar programs.

How the States Scored

The scorecard graded 17 active shared renewables programs in 13 states plus Washington, D.C. The following are the grades issued, the states that earned them and the reasoning behind it:

  • A (12%)—Minnesota and New York. These states have incorporated the majority of identified shared renewables best practices.
  • B (29%)—California (Virtual Net Metering), Colorado, Washington, D.C., Massachusetts (Virtual Net Metering) and Maryland. Have some room for improvement, but their programs reflect many best practices and offer solid foundations for shared renewable energy development.
  • C (47%)—Connecticut (Virtual Net Metering), Delaware, Hawaii, Massachusetts (Neighborhood Net Metering), Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. These programs lack key program components necessary for successful market development.
  • D (12%)—California (Enhanced Community Renewables component of Green Tariff Shared Renewables) and Connecticut (Shared Clean Energy Facility Pilot Program). These programs do not comport with many identified best practices, which could impede program effectiveness and market development.

 

Additional articles you will be interested in.

Stay Informed

Get E+E Leader Articles delivered via Newsletter right to your inbox!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Share This